Time Period:

  • Ancient Kamarupa roughly corresponds to present-day Assam and parts of North Bengal and Bhutan, flourishing from the 4th to 12th centuries CE.
  • Major dynasties: Varman (4th–7th CE), Mlechchha (7th–9th CE), Pala (9th–12th CE).

SOCIAL LIFE

1. Social Stratification:

  • Varna System was prevalent, though not as rigid as in mainland India.
  • Four varnas existed, but tribal elements (like Bodo-Kachari, Koch, Mech, etc.) coexisted with mainstream society.
  • Intermingling of Aryan and non-Aryan traditions was common.

2. Caste and Occupation:

  • Brahmanas enjoyed high status, received land grants, and were involved in priestly and scholarly duties.
  • Kshatriyas mainly comprised ruling families and military officials.
  • Vaishyas and Shudras engaged in trade, agriculture, and manual labor.
  • Tribal communities often existed outside the varna framework but played important roles in agrarian and social life.

3. Position of Women:

  • Women held a respectable position, though patriarchal norms dominated.
  • References to learned women and royal women participating in administration exist.
  • Widow remarriage was allowed in tribal communities.
  • Dowry system was prevalent, but not universal.

4. Religion and Culture:

  • Hinduism (especially Shaivism and Vaishnavism) dominated, with tantric practices also prevalent.
  • Buddhism and Animism were practiced in certain regions.
  • Religious tolerance was a hallmark.
  • Sacrifices and rituals were common, especially during royal ceremonies.
  • Temples and sacred groves played a central role in social cohesion.

5. Education and Literature:

  • Brahmanas imparted education; Sanskrit was the dominant scholarly language.
  • Copper plate inscriptions and buranjis (chronicles) provide literary evidence.
  • Existence of gurukulas and scholars like Ratnapala and Bhaskaravarman’s court poets shows emphasis on learning.

ECONOMIC LIFE

1. Agriculture:

  • Primary occupation of the people.
  • Crops: Rice (staple), barley, sugarcane, pulses, mustard.
  • Fertile plains of Brahmaputra and irrigation from rivers made agriculture productive.
  • Land grants (agraharas) to Brahmanas and temples helped expand agriculture.

2. Land Revenue and Taxation:

  • Land revenue was the primary source of state income.
  • Taxes were paid in cash or kind.
  • Common taxes: Bali, Bhaga, Kara.
  • Epigraphic records (e.g., copper plates of Bhaskaravarman) mention land measurement and classification systems.

3. Trade and Commerce:

  • Internal and limited external trade flourished.
  • Items traded: Silk, ivory, betel-nuts, lac, rice, oil, gold, horses.
  • Trade routes connected Kamarupa with Magadha, Bengal, and China.
  • Riverine transport on Brahmaputra and its tributaries aided trade.
  • Existence of markets (hat) and merchant guilds.

4. Crafts and Industries:

  • Skilled in weaving, ivory carving, metalwork, pottery.
  • Women were particularly involved in weaving and textile production.
  • Goldsmiths, blacksmiths, carpenters, and potters were key artisan groups.

5. Currency and Coinage:

  • Use of metallic coins (mainly copper and silver).
  • References to “dramma” coins under Varman rulers.
  • Also practiced barter system, especially in rural and tribal economies.

Sources of Information


  1. Epigraphic Evidence:
    • Copper plate inscriptions (e.g., Dubi, Nidhanpur plates).
    • Land grant records describe economic and social transactions.
  2. Literary Sources:
    • Accounts of Xuanzang (Hiuen Tsang) during Bhaskaravarman’s reign.
    • Buranjis and Puranic references.
  3. Archaeological Sites:
    • Ruins at Tezpur, Guwahati, Sualkuchi, Madan Kamdev, etc.
    • Temple architecture and sculpture reveal cultural and economic aspects.

Summary

  • Ancient Kamarupa had a composite culture, with a mix of Aryan and tribal traditions.
  • Society was stratified but flexible, with significant contributions from tribal groups.
  • Economy was agrarian-based, supported by crafts, trade, and river transport.
  • Religion, education, and land grants shaped both economic and social institutions.

Leave a Comment or Write your Answer here